The more I think about it the more I think cancer is not a disease at all, more the body adapting. If you scratch a small section of your arm continually for years and it becomes inflamed because of it, this is the body's reaction to it. Let it become accustomed to it and it will become inflamed without scratching it, as the body learns and remembers. Obviously I'm just theorising and could just be plain wrong. Sucka.
So in a way I think cancer is a way that life can separate those that will not react to a problem(such as an itch on the arm) and those that will go to the doctor to prevent or stop the itch. Perhaps that's why breast cancer is such a problem - the scratching or the problem that continually occurs is not noticeable until the body takes over and goes into autopilot and then it's too late.
Can the body unlearn this adaption? Surely. Adaption triggers learning and learning can be forgotten.
That said, apparently cancer could actually an attempt to heal traumatic regions of the body that have continually been traumatised - like the small section on the arm being scratched until it becomes inflamed. Also, research shows that the repairing of the affected region is what manifests the effects of cancer - abnormal growth of new tissue to fix the problem. Somehow I wonder if the genetic make up of a cells' growth routine is manipulated(becomes 'adapted') or breaks down and thus manipulated growth becomes deadly. It's not clear to me how growth this way affects adjacent cells. unless the affected cells leak manipulated/adapted generic code that then adjacent cells incorporate and thus grow incorrectly. It makes sense that the body's reaction to damage like scratching is to heal by growing new cells. if those cells grow incorrectly, bam you have cancer. Maybe in the same way good cells incorporate the bad genetic properties, perhaps incorporating good generic properties into bad cells.
The other question is once you've acquired the bad generic properties - do all cells then have these traits, irrespective if they are bad or good and growth is just a time bomb waiting to happen. This explains why it 'spreads'.
if this was the case, a cure would be universal and resolve all cancer in the body - the cure would need to re-introduce the correct growth instructions and replace the existing manipulated or adapted instructions. This would then be shared to all cells in the body.
The other question is can generic material spread to other cells or it it isolated to bad cell?
Another question remains. Is it abnormal growth due to manipulated, traumatised cells or is it the cells depleting the trauma, thinking it's normal?
The other question is have I checked into a shrink yet?
In other news, say a stupid movie on Saturday and realised how everybody in the cinema laughed more at the parts they saw in the trailer, say at home, than in all other parts in the movie while they were in the cinema. Like verbatim. Makes me wonder where all the real people have gone?
Had a good walk into London today, really good for the soul. Got tired though. My dinner didn't taste great this evening - I really need to better learn how to cook, seriously, I mean c'mon!
Still not in the mood to do much recently - anyway.
So in a way I think cancer is a way that life can separate those that will not react to a problem(such as an itch on the arm) and those that will go to the doctor to prevent or stop the itch. Perhaps that's why breast cancer is such a problem - the scratching or the problem that continually occurs is not noticeable until the body takes over and goes into autopilot and then it's too late.
Can the body unlearn this adaption? Surely. Adaption triggers learning and learning can be forgotten.
That said, apparently cancer could actually an attempt to heal traumatic regions of the body that have continually been traumatised - like the small section on the arm being scratched until it becomes inflamed. Also, research shows that the repairing of the affected region is what manifests the effects of cancer - abnormal growth of new tissue to fix the problem. Somehow I wonder if the genetic make up of a cells' growth routine is manipulated(becomes 'adapted') or breaks down and thus manipulated growth becomes deadly. It's not clear to me how growth this way affects adjacent cells. unless the affected cells leak manipulated/adapted generic code that then adjacent cells incorporate and thus grow incorrectly. It makes sense that the body's reaction to damage like scratching is to heal by growing new cells. if those cells grow incorrectly, bam you have cancer. Maybe in the same way good cells incorporate the bad genetic properties, perhaps incorporating good generic properties into bad cells.
The other question is once you've acquired the bad generic properties - do all cells then have these traits, irrespective if they are bad or good and growth is just a time bomb waiting to happen. This explains why it 'spreads'.
if this was the case, a cure would be universal and resolve all cancer in the body - the cure would need to re-introduce the correct growth instructions and replace the existing manipulated or adapted instructions. This would then be shared to all cells in the body.
The other question is can generic material spread to other cells or it it isolated to bad cell?
Another question remains. Is it abnormal growth due to manipulated, traumatised cells or is it the cells depleting the trauma, thinking it's normal?
The other question is have I checked into a shrink yet?
In other news, say a stupid movie on Saturday and realised how everybody in the cinema laughed more at the parts they saw in the trailer, say at home, than in all other parts in the movie while they were in the cinema. Like verbatim. Makes me wonder where all the real people have gone?
Had a good walk into London today, really good for the soul. Got tired though. My dinner didn't taste great this evening - I really need to better learn how to cook, seriously, I mean c'mon!
Still not in the mood to do much recently - anyway.